The House Designers and ENERGY STAR
Monroe, CT (PRWEB) November 02, 2011
The House Designers and ENERGY STAR
Category: Green Energy Press Releases
Subscribe
Enter your email address below to receive updates each time we publish new content.
Youtube.com/user/biogreeninvestments
Recent Posts
- Premier Holding Corporation Exclusive Interview on InterlinkedTV
- ATMOS Global Introduces a New Advanced Multi-system Dust Management and Dust Control Technology, “DustPack”, Featured in the Mining Engineering Magazine (SME-USA)
- ATMOS Global Introduces a New Advanced Multi-system Dust Management and Dust Control Technology, “DustPack”, Featured in the Mining Engineering Magazine (SME-USA)
- Stevens Institute of Technology is Proud to Host Norman Augustine, Inaugural Speaker for the President?s Distinguished Lecture Series
- Growing Security Concerns and Demand from Developing Markets Drives the Electronic Security Systems Market, According to New Report by Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
- Growing Security Concerns and Demand from Developing Markets Drives the Electronic Security Systems Market, According to New Report by Global Industry Analysts, Inc.
- One Stop Green expands LED Lighting Line for Homes
- Architectural Resource and Old School Construction Present Visible Green Home? Tour of Ann Arbor Michigan’s “Riverview House”
- Niyato Industries Delivers its First Compressed Natural Gas N150
- Eight Reasons Why Niyato Will Be Like No Other EV Company
- Irrepressible-The Story of Niyato Industries, America’s Electric Car Company-Part 4-Time to Invest
- Irrepressible-The Story of Niyato Industries, America’s Electric Car Company-Part 3
- Irrepressible-The Story of Niyato Industries, America’s Electric Car Company-Part 2
- Irrepressible-The Story of Niyato Industries, America’s Electric Car Company
- Niyato Industries to Hire Returning Veterans
Speak to an Advisor Now
Take a Poll
Loading ...Follow Us
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Exception' with message 'String could not be parsed as XML' in /home/content/86/7404586/html/INVESTINGREENENERGY.COM/wp-content/plugins/tweetable/mh_twitter_class.php:298 Stack trace: #0 /home/content/86/7404586/html/INVESTINGREENENERGY.COM/wp-content/plugins/tweetable/mh_twitter_class.php(298): SimpleXMLElement->__construct('') #1 /home/content/86/7404586/html/INVESTINGREENENERGY.COM/wp-content/plugins/tweetable/tweetable.php(344): Twitter_API->rate_limit_status('334532814-CrEM7...', 'LvuKw6JzfDPsm5Y...') #2 /home/content/86/7404586/html/INVESTINGREENENERGY.COM/wp-content/plugins/tweetable/tweetable.php(406): tweetable_api_rate_status() #3 /home/content/86/7404586/html/INVESTINGREENENERGY.COM/wp-content/plugins/tweetable/tweetable.php(162): tweetable_get_recent_tweets() #4 [internal function]: tweetable_write_widget(Array) #5 /home/content/86/7404586/html/INVESTINGREENENERGY.COM/wp-includes/widgets.php(894): call_user_func_array('tweetable_write...', Array) #6 /home/content/86/7404586/htm in /home/content/86/7404586/html/INVESTINGREENENERGY.COM/wp-content/plugins/tweetable/mh_twitter_class.php on line 298
@Sumwun23 No, but we aren’t anywhere near close to running out at this point, either. Of course scientists and engineers should continue working on increasing the efficiency of current technologies while the search continues for feasible replacements. There are numerous potential replacements for fossil fuels, but none of them are ready for prime time yet. Forcing a conversion now only makes energy more expensive for all, a great disservice to those among us with the least.
@NelsonDemartini91 That is absolutely wrong. Present some evidence to support your claim because that sounds ridiculous when you take into account the acres upon acres of devastated forest due to oil drilling. I don’t believe that claim for one second. Furthermore, I’d pay more for a cleaner product anyway.
@sherajr but…the solar and wind technologies require the power of fossil fuels to run. And with their low success rate as of now, aren’t we just burning our limited supply faster by failing with green energy?
@drysift The most corrupt business on the earth? Its called politics.
@drysift oil companies also generate a lot more energy per square metre (feet if you deal in imperial measures) of shade. Also a lot more energy per dollar spent.
@Sumwun23 The other choice is called nuclear. We are a very, very long way from running out of uranium.
@rdrakken @rdrakken I’m not defending Gary Andres, but is seems that you’ve got this story all wrong. From every article I’ve read, Andres wasn’t involved in the contract between Solyndra and Dutko. He couldn’t have signed off on the loan, because he would have had to have either worked on the loan for Dutko, which he didn’t or he would have had to been employed by the U.S. DOE, which he wasn’t. The fact still remains that the top insider at Solyndra was and is an Obama campaign bundler.
@OrionXIII
What exactly is your point? Green energy isn’t perfect, but it’s pretty much the only choice left. We can’t use gas when we run out of it.
@sherajr People will develop alternatives to oil on their own, when we do start to run out of oil. Just like how we developed fiber optic cables and satellites to carry information, in order to replace copper wire. Just like we developed semiconductor technology to replace vacuum tubes in computers. All without any government subsidies.
hahaha, where is your Solyndra scandel now GoP whores? What do you have to say now that they broke on Gary Andres being the one responsible not only for signing off on the loan, but PUSHING for it and it turns out was WORKING for a firm hired to LOBBY for Solyndra on top of it…and he was a top GOP AIDE!
And to top it off, everything shows that the Administration didnt like the idea of the loan but went with it because of the Committee recomendation!
Eat more dick party whores…
“…4 out of every 5 renewable energy companies backed by the Energy Department was ‘run by or primarily owned by Obama financial backers.’ Those companies’ ‘political largesse is probably the best investment they ever made in alternative energy. It brought them returns many times over.’ ”
—Expose Obama of 15 Nov 2011 quoting Peter Schweizer
Isn’t “Green” synonymous to “sustainable”? That’s what I thought. But yeah, FUCK green jobs! lol, let’s just keep drilling until the resources on Earth run out. Hopefully by then we will have built a spacecraft that runs on poor people so we can make our way to the next planet and use up all those resources.
OR
We can continue to DEVELOP solar and wind (and other sustainable) technologies, which I think will allow our society to hybridize our methods of energy generation and storage.
silly fallacious arguments that merely make the editor look ignorant and amateur
@OrionXIII You’re so mad, because I keep shooting down every argument you make. You keep saying “I’m an engineer” as if that means anything at all. I’m an astrophysicist and I’ve worked with NASA on solar technology. I’m not sure if you’re getting paid enough to sit here and cry, lol.
“Show me any one oil rig that creates less shade than any one solar panel.” I noticed you like to dodge questions that prove you wrong.
PS- Google “cities that run off of renewable energy” you helpless dolt.
@drysift
Um, I don’t believe Babcock Ranch – a prototype ‘city’ (planned: 45K) – has been completed yet. But nice try. Care to list ‘many more’ just like it around the world? They don’t seem to do well at night, either.
Child, you’re either a troll or mentally challenged. Either way, you’re really not worth the time it takes to reply to you. I’m an engineer, I’ve done work with renewable energy. You’re an idiot. Have a good life.
Orion
@OrionXIII LOL you’re absolutely wrong. Babcock Ranch, FL is a city ran entirely off Solar energy. There are many more just like it around the world, which all use renewable energy. Houses, or entire buildings ran off renewable sources, makes no difference at all. Again, think outside the box.
Show me any one oil rig that creates less shade than any one solar panel. You can’t, you’re wrong again. Furthermore, if you can’t scroll down 5 inches to see my comment, you’re slower than I thought lol!
@drysift
There are a lot more Oil companies with much broader range of operations than Solar companies so your comparison is specious. WHAT other comment? I’m an Engineer, and I’m guessing you’re not, so I doubt your brain cell insult is anywhere near factual.
And individual solar installations are not a replacement for large-scale energy generation: Which is what we’ve been discussing. My comment related to that, not to individual installations.
@OrionXIII FACT: Oil companies create more shade and pollution than solar companies. Please refer to my other comment below for more facts. I clearly have more facts than you have brain cells. BTW, yes you are confused. A “large-scale solar farm” is a horrible idea, especially when solar panels can be built into the existing infrastructure of just about anything. Think outside the box blockhead.
@drysift
Well, I’m glad I can provide you some amusement – However, I wasn’t referring to individual residential installations, I was talking about large-scale solar farms; The sort of thing that you’d use to replace a power plant with. Something on the scale of a large-scale wind farm rather than a household windmill.
Try to preach less and present facts more next time, OK? Evidently it was not I who was confused, but you.
Orion
@OrionXIII LOL solar panel shade killing ecosystems? What a trivial argument. I’m literally laughing. How much shade does an oil drill create? Oh thats right, there are no trees, because they cut them all down, don’t reforest the land, or recycle the countless gallons of water they waste, while polluting rivers; it’s THE most corrupt business on earth. Furthermore, most solar panels are superficial additions to existing structures i.e. office buildings. You sir, are severely confused.
Video is misleading, and offensive in the way it mocks and discredits the achievements of scientists and engineers.
Solar panels are actually very effective, and bound to become more efficient as well as versatile. A PV polycrystalline module will produce enough clean power in about four years to offset the energy required to manufacture it. I wonder bother to discredit the other arguments in the video, but to sum it up you unfortunately have to consume a little energy to save a lot more.
@rdrakken
You made no points, nothing to negate… actually your insults are just making me laugh at this point. Puppy barking behind a fence much? Awww whose a cute little Marxist, you are, you are… that’s a good boy. Go redistribute the wealth boy, come on you can do it! Get the stick…
So puppies defeated, next?
@BoyKagome No. A debate is defined as ” a formal METHOD of interactive and representational argument”.
formal is not the definition, its the method of the meaning. The meaning is INTERACTIVE AND REPRESENTATIONAL ARGUMENT.
Learn the fucking language thundercunt. See, I swore AND completely refuted what you said by pointing out how you left out all the important information…namely what doesnt back your claim.
So, asshat cock munch, try making a claim with some credibility. shitcock.
@rdrakken
No… a debate is defined as Debate- ” a formal exchange.”… by swearing or insulting you break formality. You yourself called it a debate, which means by you saying moron you lose… and I negated your points for the fun of it anyway because I am human… and the more I talk I just become a conservative you hate more…and more…and more! Course you could end it by not replying but that’s not something your pride will allow… or will it!… See only human.
@BoyKagome The fact you just fell back on the “OMG you swore” so I dont need to debate anymore thing proves you know you can no longer back your claims.
Thank you.